In many companies, personnel development is still organized reactively: Only when employees are overwhelmed in their role, innovations falter or fluctuation increases is there a call for qualification measures.
However, those who only react to skills gaps in crisis mode lose time, trust and often money. There are tried and tested ways of identifying learning needs at an early stage – and addressing them strategically.
Organizations today operate in an environment characterized by disruption, digitalization and demographic change. New technologies, hybrid forms of work and changing customer expectations are constantly demanding new skills – at all levels. The key question is therefore not whether further development is necessary, but where, when and how it should take place.
Those who take a systematic approach here create the basis for sustainable, effective personnel development – and thus for the success of the entire company.
Skill mapping is far more than just a snapshot. It is a strategic tool for systematically recording and comparing current and future skills requirements.
This is how it works in practice:
The resulting “skills gap” analysis shows where there is a need for development – on an individual, team or company-wide basis.
Practical example:
A medium-sized industrial company integrated skill mapping into the annual appraisals of its managers. This not only documented the current status, but also reflected on the future requirements for leadership in a more digitalized production environment. The result: a company-wide qualification program for “Leadership in digital times” was developed.
Feedback is one of the most direct ways to make development potential visible – provided it is structured, continuous and multidimensional.
The following, for example, have proven themselves in practice:
Important: Feedback is particularly effective when it is established as an integral part of a learning culture rather than a one-off.
Practical example:
An international service company introduced quarterly team reviews. Teams were not only asked to reflect on goals, but also to assess which skills were missing or needed to be strengthened for the next sprint. The results were incorporated directly into individual learning plans.
While skill mapping and feedback often focus on current or short-term needs, strategic analysis is aimed at long-term development perspectives. The aim here is to anticipate future requirements – and to derive current learning needs from this.
The central questions are:
Practical example:
A financial services provider used workshops with divisional managers to define so-called future competence fields based on the corporate strategy – including “data competence”, “collaborative leadership” and “customer-centric thinking”. Specific learning journeys for key positions were developed from these fields.
Recognizing learning needs in good time is not an add-on, but a strategic success factor. HR developers who work with systematic methods at an early stage create the basis for targeted, tailored training – instead of hectic ad hoc measures.